Don’t throw down Voltaire for Voltage: A student’s defense of humanities

Hugh Coates

The year before I began my university career studying a BA in History, it was reported that A Level students were shunning humanities subjects. This downturn has largely been blamed on the much advertised uncertainty of the economy, with prospective students adapting to this climate by choosing vocational courses with clear gateways into the working world.

As a member of  the imprecisely labelled demographic of ‘young people’, from the age of 16 to the present day, I have been fed the bitter cocktail of how foreboding and unforgiving the modern-day job market is. Competition is rife for graduate jobs and my school, college and university were not at all out of line advertising this. The career guidance I received was fairly one-dimensional: do law to become a lawyer, do medicine to become a doctor, study surveying to become a surveyor. For many people under the cloud of such uncertain times, in pursuit of some sort of reassurance, the clearest path to a job, is often the best path.

I was lucky…

I have always been glued to some sort of historical book. Horrible Histories occupied me when I was younger and marching through Max Hasting’s brilliant volumes, as I am older. However, interest, as is the case in many things, does not always translate into grade performance. On the back of some fairly uninspiring grade predictions for my AS History paper, I set out to look for a University where I could study Psychology, realizing that if my attained grades for History matched my predictions, I would be better served looking to do a different course at a ‘better’ university.

I continued to work at History, with Biology taking my focus during my A-levels, as my required science subject to apply to the Psychology course. When visiting universities I would only casually visit the history departments, with a passing interest but without any real conviction. I did this largely to humour my mother – whose study of history at A-level had not marked the end point of her enjoyment of the subject.

It was on one open day, on the south coast, that it all just clicked. The University in question had a respectable looking humanities campus – not the run down, out of sight department that I had seen elsewhere, on other visits. I thought to myself, ‘this University respects this discipline’, it got me thinking and, after some very positive results in my History AS-Level, I chose to, and luckily was accepted into, said University. I had blindly gone for the subject I loved unquestionably.

To many students, this approach is uncomfortable and illogical. I was going for a humanities subject, one that could branch into many fields of work, but one that does not select it for you.

Classifying the value of degree in this way is the first mistake students make. Yes, as consumers, this can be viewed simply as a transaction. The fee-paying student seeks to obtain the skills that will get them into the most agreeable jobs for the modest price of £9000 a year. But ‘transferable skills’ is only one part of this transaction. For a humanities degree, it is only a small part. Cultural enrichment is a term that would probably cause many to cringe. It is probably a term you would find in a fictional dystopian Orwellian novel, whereby an unfortunate protagonist is ‘encouraged’ to reacquaint themselves with the values of their ‘mother’ country. Label it however you wish, it is the study of humanity that provides this knowledge and awareness, which encourages us to adopt an open-minded free-thinking approach to solving life’s may conundrums. It is within the field of Law, by all accounts a career which avoids that all too familiar situation at that family drinks party where one well-oiled guest decides to question your entire future, that the value of humanities is arguably understood the most. Maths graduates are considered desirable for their logical approach to problem solving and humanities students for their cultural awareness and creativity. This is not a skill, this is quality of personality and mind, nurtured over the course of a humanities degree.

The world needs logical thinkers and it needs creativity. Science degrees will certainly provide the latter, simply by virtue of the material being consulted and the way it is assessed. Humanities students are pushed to think creatively and outside the box. No one group is more important than the other. Steve Jobs’ vision would have been nothing without the insurmountable talent at his disposable, but without Job’s anthropological and sociological background, it would equally have been wasted. Rarely in history have individuals been truly gifted with both of these things. When they have, they have gone on to do great things, Albert Einstein and Steven Hawking, but to name a few. And yet, the world cannot rely on these rare instances. Creativity must be fostered and the place this begins is at University.

The stigma from within Universities, against humanities students, as an irrelevant luxury must go. Not for the sake of those studying there, they know why they’re there, but for those who are making the almost life changing decision on what degree course to embark upon. Schools must be more creative and enthusiastic about the opportunities presented by taking a humanities degree. Faculties have argued that the solution lies in the graduates of humanities degrees sharing their experiences so as to encourage others to follow in their footsteps. For the lecturers of empire and feminist history alike to expect this, for them to attract the most promising, they too must be realistic. Students may often omit an aura of peaceful ignorance to their long-term prospects, but in reality, we worry, we worry a lot. History, English, and Philosophy departments across the land, must accept that they will lose some of their best young thinkers to industry and elsewhere. They must be more active and forceful in promoting the utility of a humanities degree for a career outside of academia, instead of limply repeating the term ‘transferable skills’, without any real additional direction.

We live in concerning times, where from a young age, setting a course for a job is top of the agenda. We are encouraged to assess what we are good at, and what we are are not. To dust off the careers book and plot the course of our entire adult life in but a few years. A humanities degree does not hold you back on this path to employment. It allows you to become a more rounded individual with a skill-set and more importantly, a mindset, that is of just as much importance to the job sector and indeed humanity itself.

GE2015: don’t throw it away

By Hugh Coates

I’m worried.

In less than a month’s time, people old and young, poor and rich, morally barren, idealistically blind or otherwise will cast their vote on who they believe should take the tiller of this country, or at least share the grip.

Very near to me, the constituency of Norwich South – narrowly secured by the Lib Dems last time round – faces an almighty offensive from the Green Party as they look to make inroads into a traditionally Tory controlled part of the country. The volume of students in the city, mingled with general discontentment over issues such as poor transport links, has made this a potentially successful venture for the Green Party, with voters looking for something slightly different.

What concerns me is how students, as is the case for Norwich South, make for such a tempting foothold. It doesn’t take a political analyst to point out that students are feeling a little irked by politics these days, I also feel deeply misled – £9000 tuition fees is something I won’t be allowed to forget in hurry. After such a shafting, I am astonished by the number of people who will still show indifference to politics, or just give away their vote in protest.

Before I begin, let me be clear, I have no problem with anybody, having considered all the parties, deciding to vote for a party, that is democracy. What I do take issue with, is people directing their vote towards one party based on its face value and denying it from another,  for the same reason. It is this sort of puerile approach to politics that the Green Party so clearly demonstrated in their recent election video, a parody involving a harmonizing group of four middle aged men, wearing blue, red, purple and yellow-gold ties. Not only is this view illusory to the point of being willfully deceptive, it reveals a serious lack of credibility on the part of the Green Party. It makes Nigel Farage patrolling the cliffs of Dover and Martin Freeman’s most recent casting as a downtrodden ‘working man’ almost endearing (I love your work Martin I really do, I’m just making a point). From the Green Party’s position somewhere miles to the left – almost unrecognisable in the fog of radicalism – these 4 groups must look remarkably close to together. But to anyone and I mean anyone, who has clicked on to the BBC website, or any other mainstream news provider, and has had even the most cursory look at who is saying what, we see an election campaign not of 4 synonymous parties, but an exciting discourse between parties with different beliefs.

I plan to round off this article by sharing some of the most striking features of the Green ideal for anyone thinking of voting for them in ‘protest’:

1) Under the glorious Green Party, being a member of al-Qaeda, the IRA and other currently proscribed terrorist groups will no longer be a criminal offence. In the interest of full disclosure, I must confess that having grown up under the shadow of at least one of these malevolent groups and having heard a great deal about the other, that I hold no desire to live aside anyone who shares the beleifs of a terrorist group on our rather small island, which may have influenced my views somewhat.

2): Under the Green Party, we will leave NATO, tell the U.S. where to stick their ‘special relationship’, completely abandon our nuclear weapons and disband an ‘unnecessary’ army, air force and navy. In a world where war was only waged with inflatable swords, this would be an understandable approach.

3) Football clubs would not be traded on the stock market and would become cooperatives. Urm…

I have selected a few policies here that would aggravate me personally. There are some Green policies which I do believe have genuine merit, but they are very much in the minority. Certainly not enough to win my vote. The point is, I have made an informed decision.

I urge anyone planning on just gifting their vote to a party they don’t know much about or who ‘seem nice’, to please, at least, investigate further. If you find they are for you, then great. But throwing your vote around like confetti is nearly as bad as not voting at all – as the great thinker of our time Russell Brand is calling for. In the words of the the party’s leader herself, Natalie Bennett, the Green Party want ‘committed’ voters and not those ‘who lend us their vote when they’ve despaired of all the others and want to protest.’ Don’t become one of those people.

To anyone teetering on the fence of uncertainty, I urge you to visit this marvelous site to inform your decision: